Every musician that's played a live show has been in a situation where they can't hear themself on stage. It's usually something we all just put up with - but, with the best in-ear monitors (or IEMs), you no longer have to be at the mercy of the sound guy. These personal monitoring systems will allow you to take back control of your mix, protect your ears and play to a click live, all while providing the best possible quality of monitoring.
The best in-ear monitors aren't just for live use either. IEMs can also be of benefit in other scenarios, such as the studio or rehearsal room. They can trump the standard over-ear or on-ear studio headphones by eliminating the discomfort felt by many as a result of ill-fitting cans squashing your ears into your skull.
Whether you're rehearsing with your bandmates, practicing on your own, recording epic vocals at home, or you're simply preparing to get back on stage, IEMs are an ideal solution for monitoring in any situation.
If you'd like to read more about the best in-ear monitors, then hit the 'buying advice' tab above. It'll take you to our expert buying advice. If you'd rather just get straight to the products, then keep on scrolling.
Best in-ear monitors: Our top picks
With such a disparity in price between entry-level and high-end, you'll know for yourself where your choices are likely to lie. That aside, there are a couple of models we'd recommend for reasons not relating to cost. The Audio Technica ATH-E70, for example, are a superb set of in-ear monitors for anyone looking to improve on the default sets many wireless kits ship with. Swap them out for a set of the ATH-E70s and you'll notice a considerable improvement in your rig.
We're also heavily enamoured with the Shure SE846. Ignoring the bland outward appearance, these are the only set we tested that made music we thought we knew inside out reveal new secrets to us. The sound quality was out of the world; invest in a pair of these and you might never need another set of earphones again.
That said, if budget really is your biggest concern, the Mackie MP-220s are fantastically affordable dual-driver earphones that deliver great audio and a snug fit, for very little cash.
Best in-ear monitors: Product guide
The problem that comes with reviewing in-ear monitors is that so many of them look the same. All across the price spectrum, you'll find generic 'clear plastic housing with various electrical gubbins' type arrangements. But, as we found out when we tested the Shure SE846 Pro, not all IEMs are created equal.
Basically, these blew us away. In terms of sound reproduction, you can see why the audiophile crowd gravitate towards them. A neat touch is the inclusion of a set of three 'nozzles', which can be interchanged to tailor the listening experience. But, importantly, they also offer up to 37dB of sound attenuation making them ideal for noisy stages and studios. You could conceivably not notice the apocalypse if you had these on and, with sound this good, the apocalypse can wait quite frankly.
Read the full Shure SE846 Pro review
If you've spent out on a decent wireless system but found the included earphones are somewhat lacking, then don't fret; they are the easiest part to replace. And, as a step up, you'll want to look for something which improves the overall sound and ambient noise isolation.
The Audio Technica ATH-E70 are just the ticket when it comes to choosing the best in-ear monitors for middling budgets. Sitting pretty in the midrange, these earphones feature three drivers which provide a balanced, accurate soundstage. As a step up from the entry-level, there is an increase in the cost but if you've used basic 'phones for a while you'll certainly notice a difference in performance.
Read the full Audio Technica ATH-E70 review
Sonically, the IE 40 Pro sounds reasonably natural, with good articulation in the high frequencies and a full but not overpowering low end. They are quite bright in the top end at higher volumes, but this isn’t a deal killer.
Also rather positive is the comfort and fit. With a medium-sized in-ear module and quickly replaceable tips, you can quickly achieve a decent fit - important if you’ll be wearing them for long stretches. In fact, we’d say these are some of the most comfortable off-the-shelf in-ear monitors we’ve tried; impressive given the modest price tag. Shame about the rather short lead (1.3m) and lack of lead extender.
The IE 40 Pro in-ear monitors deliver decent sonics without costing silly money and suit live use as well as general playback duties.
Read the full Sennheiser IE 40 Pro review
When choosing a set of in-ear monitors, the number of drivers is a significant metric to consider. Budget models tend to offer only one, leaving the burden of reproducing every bass, mid and treble frequency to one single driver. Explore a bit higher up the range and you'll see why separating these out is important.
The Mackie MP-220 is a great example. By employing two drivers - one for highs, one for lows - the sound quality is improved immensely. A snug fit from the earbud provides good isolation too, making these an ideal first 'proper' set of IEMs for any budding performer.
Read the full Mackie MP220 review
Shure is known as a real heavyweight in the world of sound recording and production, so we were expecting great things from the Shure SE215 in-ear monitors. Thankfully, our pick for the best budget in-ear monitors delivered.
Shure claims the SE215s block out around 90 percent of ambient noise, which makes them ideal for most musical applications. The thickened detachable cable also indicates a degree of ruggedness to them, although we did pick up some slight magnetic interference when they came into contact with our hands.
They're not high end - only one driver is employed here - however as an entry to the world of IEMs they're very respectable. And, as a bonus, they are phenomenal when just used to listen to Spotify or the like. Overkill? Not at all...
Read the full Shure SE215 Pro review
Working musicians need to look a little higher up the chain when it comes to choosing the best wireless in-ear monitoring system for them. When your livelihood depends on providing a quality performance, night after night, then you need to be sure the gear you're using can cope.
The Sennheiser EW IEM G4 system offers that assurance. As one of the biggest names in audio transmission, Sennheiser can be trusted when it comes to its monitoring line-up. The G4 system is reliable, high quality and offers useful features like a 330 feet transmission range and easy synchronisation between transmitter and receiver via infrared.
While any of the monitors we're listing today will suit a live performance role, not all of them translate as well to other uses. Put simply, good monitors are often good because they don't flatter the sound. Indeed, their flat frequency means they are used to critically evaluate a sound, not dress it up for your listening pleasure.
There is a middle ground though, and it is here that the Fender FXA7 monitors sit. They're perfectly suited to on-stage use on account of their 22dB of noise reduction, yet their 16-ohm impedance means they can also do a solid job of reproducing tunes from your mp3 player or smartphone.
Read the full Fender FXA7 review
At the other end of the price spectrum sit the InEar ProPhile-8. These, as you'd expect for the price, are a completely different kettle of fish, designed for the touring musician rather than the home studio enthusiast. A total of eight internal drivers provide the peak of balanced, powerful sound, while ambient noise absorption levels of around 26 dB ensure superb isolation.
What stands out with the ProPhile-8 set is the incredible transmission range. Everything, from the deepest sub bass through to the chimiest synth notes resonate with ease. So good, you might not want to take them off.
If wireless is the way for you to go, the LD MEI100 G2 is a great way to get started. This kit, which includes a transmitter, receiver and set of basic headphones, offers up to 96 UHF channels, with a decent dynamic range and frequency response.
Up to eight hour running time is possible via two AA batteries, while a total of five receivers can link up with the central transmitter. You're not going to achieve high class audio reproduction, but as a way to get to grips with wireless systems this one is worth a look.
Best in-ear monitors: Buying advice
Do I need wireless in-ear monitors?
A good place to start when choosing the best in-ear monitors for you is deciding if you want to go with wired or wireless IEMs. Your answer will depend on what instrument you play. For drummers, in their (usually) static positions, it can often make sense to have that pure, wired sound as this provides no risk of audio dropout or interference.
Singers, guitarists, keyboard players and anyone else front of stage however would benefit from a wireless solution. These comprise a transmitter device, into which you plug the output from the mixing desk, and a receiver pack which takes a radio signal from the transmitter and feeds it into the monitors themselves. From here you can then decide if you want a full-band mix in your monitors, or selected parts of it.
Why do I need in-ear monitors?
A benefit of using IEMs is that you don't have to play as loudly on stage; often, particularly with drummers, musicians find themselves inadvertently competing with each other in order to hear themselves. This isn't an issue with IEMs, so you can employ a much defter touch without fear of those nuances being drowned out. Singers will also benefit by being able to much more precisely hear the notes they're hitting (or otherwise)...
At the top end of the price range, you'll find the headphone element of the system with all kinds of interesting tech involved. As with any headphones, the drivers are the parts that convert the electrical signal into something you can hear. Budget options may feature one or two drivers, but at the pro-level you'll find monitors with up to eight drivers. This offers benefits like extended frequency brackets or wider dynamic ranges, but you'll pay for the privilege.
Custom foam earbuds, taken from a mould made of the individual's own ear canal, are another option. This has superior noise-blocking properties, but ears can change over time so you may find this isn't a life-long solution and you may need to upgrade sooner than you think. Some musicians have also spoken of feeling a tad left out of the fun with this approach – if the noise-blocking stops you hearing the applause and noise of the crowd, what's the point, and did the gig even happen?